Ayodhya Verdict: The Five Supreme Court Judges Who ...
Ayodhya Verdict: The Five Supreme Court Judges Who ...
Ayodhya verdict: The man who helped Lord Ram win - BBC News
Ayodhya Verdict: Entire Disputed Site Goes to Hindus for ...
Ayodhya Case: The 5 Judges Who Delivered Ayodhya Verdict Today
Ayodhya verdict: Justice for all, loss to none
Ayodhya verdict: The five judges who will deliver the SC ...
Political dimensions of Ayodhya verdict SabrangIndia
ayodhya verdict judges vote
ayodhya verdict judges vote - win
Confused and ambivalent regarding Sabarimala
Hypocrisy that is the liberal ecosystem.
The policy for reservation is now a days defended on post-rawls concept of 'participation and representation' i.e. it is important for an institution to be representative of the society it is catering to. This mostly aids in gathering of diverse view points and a person from a particular background will have mature understanding of the issues about the background he is coming from. e.g. it is important to have a muslim judge on the triple talaq case and that is what we did. We had 3 judges from the minority sections of the society, 4 if you include the sikhs along with parsis.
It is often said that we need to increase the women participation in institutions because we need it to be more representative. E.g. how many women voted on the Triple Talaq Bill? How many were Muslim Women representatives? That is the current line of liberal thought and I respect that.
Justice Indu Malhotra was the lone dissenter in the Sabarimala verdict. Her judgement is a must read and the followed up discussions (which were none) regarding her opinions is a good estimate of where the hypocrisy lies. The case primarily dealt with the rights of Hindu women being allowed inside the Sanctum of the temple. A Hindu Woman judge categorically stated and reasoned as to why this is a tradition and therefore is a case of exception and not exclusion.
First you want representation and then make nothing out of it. Why shout your guts out for a lady judge if you are not willing to listen to her voice regarding her own section of society?
This problem is because of, in my opinion, the top-down approach of societal reform. It is where the intellectuals and progressives think 2+2 = 4 and try to enforce it on the ground but that is very difficult. This judgement could very well fall into the 'patriarchy' stuff they themselves shout about Men Telling where Women can and cannot go. Pius Hindus telling Women cannot go, Progressive Hindus telling Women should go. Nobody asked the Hindu Women whether they themselves wanna go or not? Who the fuck cares about consensus, I want to be remembered as the 'woke' judge who smashed one form patriarchy by enforcing my version of patriarchy.
Again you have reduced Women to a commodity in the whole situation. The very thing we all should be trying to let-go of.
My ambivalence is this. I have grown up in Mumbai, having friends from every possible background and ethnicity imaginable. I have girl-friends (who don't support Modi and are in fact communists) tell me the same thing "well if this is one exception then be it". Then who are these women trying to force themselves in, have they even followed the 50 days of fasting that is done before walking up the hill? Should they be supported in their stuff?
Brazil's new President made an interesting statement two days ago, we want good citizens not political militants.
After all this, my respect for the social reformers have only increased. Today morning I got up at night told an anecdote about Savitribai Phule to the kids I volunteer every Saturday, I will share it in some other post. The reformers didn't live in the newsrooms or the lutyens but actually worked among the masses, trying to bring the reform bottom-up.
If that is the case, isn't God everywhere? There are 100s of Ayyappa Shrines across this country where women can go in, why they keep interest in this one alone. Aren't the Hindus told that Ram is everywhere and hence no need of temple at Ayodhya?
PS: amazing thing happened: as I was writing the last sentence, my laptop showed a bluescreen and I thought LOL sab mehenat gaya kaam se, luckily Ctrl + Shift + R saved the day.
Ayodhya verdict: Justice for all, loss to none The basis of the verdict delivered is not faith or belief system but, purely and clearly, the law of the land. Ayodhya Verdict: Given the sensitivity of the case, the government has increased the security cover for all the judges involved. All India Edited by Jimmy Jacob Updated: November 09, 2019 11:27 am IST Ayodhya verdict: The five judges who will deliver the SC judgment The five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court is headed by the Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and includes CJI-designate ... New Delhi: A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, on Saturday pronounced a unanimous verdict in the historic Ayodhya land dispute case. The judgment came a week before Gogoi, on November 17, demits office and passes on the office to Justice SA Bobde. The Supreme Court ruled that the dispute area, comprising 2.77 acres, will be ... Ayodhya Verdict: Entire Disputed Site Goes to Hindus for Ram Mandir, Muslims to Get 5 Acres of Alternate Land In the judgement running into 1,045 pages, the apex court said a report by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) provided evidence of the remains of a building "that was not Islamic" beneath the demolished mosque. The Supreme Court judgement on the Ayodhya case has brought a long-standing dispute to a legal end.-Of course the right to demand a review is there, but whether any of the parties will exercise that right is not yet clear.-The way the issue developed, it was obvious that the only way forward was through a judicial verdict. That verdict is now out. Ayodhya verdict: The man who helped ... the judges also concluded that it was the "faith and belief of Hindus" that the place was the birthplace of Ram, ... US House to hold vote on fate of ...
Gravitas: Ayodhya Case: The Judges Who Delivered The ...
5 Judges Given Unanimous Verdict On Ayodhya But Different Arguments in Various Courts A Story#LatestNews#EtvTelangana A five-member Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi delivered its verdict in the Ayodhya temple-mosque title suit today. Here's a... Ayodhya Verdict: Supreme Court Judges Unanimously Dismiss Shia Waqf Board's Petition#AyodhyaVerdictWatch Live Streaming On http://www.publictv.in/liveDownloa... The judges at the Supreme Court have begun reading out judgment in the century-old Ayodhya case. The judgment comes almost a decade after the Allahabad High ... In what will go down in history as one of its most landmark verdicts, the Supreme Court on Saturday granted the ownership of the 2.77 acres of disputed land ... The Supreme Court will deliver its verdict on the Ayodhya dispute today, ending decades of uncertainty on the issue. The decision was taken by Chief Justice ... Profile Of The Judges Of The 5-Judge Bench Which Delivered Historic Ayodhya Verdict. The World is One News, WION examines global issues with in-depth analysi...